Six Ways Community Engagement Consulting Can Unlock Resident Trust and Satisfaction for Your Government Administration

“Leadership should be born out of the understanding of the needs of those who would be affected by it.” – Marian Anderson

One of the greatest challenges any responsible leader faces is cultivating everyone’s voice, opinion, and sentiments and processing that collection of voices into an outcome that can guide the greater good.

Whether you lead a community of 200 or two million, a special district, or an association of like-minded difference-makers, your community has entrusted you to make resident-informed decisions that create a positive quality of life for all stakeholders. Making representative decisions would be easy if a consensus of opinion could be absolute on every topic and initiative. However, any leader knows that there is a counterpoint for every point, and for every yay, there is a nay.

The imperative of leading by majority and making decisions with as much input from as many voices as possible is at the heart of our community and local organizational leadership. We have election days, council votes, and town halls to empower representational decision-making. These data-gathering and decision-making models that date back generations will always have their place in society. However, how can the modern leader scale their data-gathering and sourcing of impactful inputs at a time when those we serve include the broadest imaginable spectrum of engagement and access to information and polling places? Layer onto this challenge the complications of language barriers, economic disparity, the digital divide, the impact of the vocal dissenting minority, and the challenge of data gathering are exacerbated exponentially.

According to FairVote.org, in recent decades, about 60% of the voting-eligible population voted during presidential election years, and about 40% voted during midterm elections. This process decides elected officials and helps determine legislation and policy, but what about all the days in between? What about all the choices leaders, councils, and organizations must make that never make it onto ballots? What about communicating factually and statistically about the initiatives on the ballot?

If every organizational decision worth making has an impact, and every voice matters, how can leaders bridge the gap between their people and their progress? The answer is as old as the democratic process itself, but it’s more impactful than ever thanks to modern technology and the progress of community-based research methodology: quantitative and qualitative engagement.

Consider the risk of misinformation and the power of the vocal, dissenting minority. In one local community during a unique election season, voter turnout was high because there was a significant initiative on the ballot that may have meant higher taxes. In this case, the vocal minority gained control of the narrative and won the necessary votes to stop the initiative. The vote might have passed if the affirmative party executed a better communication strategy to inform voters how the initiative would improve quality of life and why the increased tax was worth the investment. In these scenarios, resident engagement is critical to initiative promotion, understanding, and success.

The Power of Community Engagement Consulting

Market research might not seem like a radical solution to a complex challenge. You’ve likely asked to see a show of hands, created an online survey, and read through evaluation forms countless times throughout your leadership journey. It’s not the what that is critical in scaling the information-gathering process of our communities and representative agencies; it’s the how — and even more critically — the determination of what to do with the findings.

The modality and efficacy of the data-gathering implementation are indescribably imperative when making representative decisions affecting a large population.

The Science Behind the Sentiments

When researching a population, it is crucial to ensure that the data fairly represents the entire population to draw accurate and generalizable conclusions. In scientific terms, this process involves sampling, statistical validity, and error factors.

Representative Sampling

A representative sample accurately reflects the population characteristics from which it is drawn. This requirement means you must proportionately include every population segment in your data sample. If certain groups are underrepresented or overrepresented, the results will be biased, leading to incorrect conclusions. For instance, if a survey about communication preferences is conducted only among young adults who are digital natives, your findings cannot be accurately generalized to the entire population, which includes middle-aged and older adults.

Statistical Validity

Statistical validity refers to the extent to which the results of a study can be trusted to reflect the population’s reality accurately. It encompasses several types of validity:

• Internal Validity: Ensures that the study design, data collection, and analysis are conducted to support causal conclusions. This requirement means controlling for confounding variables and biases within the study.
• External Validity: Refers to the generalizability of the study findings to the broader population. A survey with high external validity accurately reflects the diversity and characteristics of the entire population.

Overcoming Logistical Challenges to Ensure Data is Impactful

A critical reality in public sector community engagement research is that there will inevitably be situations where large-scale surveys are cost-prohibitive or logistically impossible to get a representative sample. Perhaps many of your residents live in rural communities or digital deserts, and reaching them for input is complex and unscalable. In these cases, market researchers can employ alternative strategies to gather and analyze data, such as the following:

• Public Databases: Using existing data from public databases, such as government reports, academic research, and industry publications, to supplement primary research.
• Social Media Listening: Analyzing data from social media platforms to understand trends, sentiments, and behaviors.
• Web Scraping: Collecting data from websites, forums, and online reviews to gather insights about services, systems, initiatives, programs, or demographics.
• Scenario Analysis: Creating and analyzing scenarios based on existing data to predict future trends and behaviors.
• Bootstrapping: Using resampling techniques to estimate the distribution of a statistic from a smaller sample.
• Regression Analysis: Applying statistical methods to infer relationships and predict outcomes based on existing data.
• In-depth interviews: Conducting detailed interviews with key stakeholders or representatives of the target demographic.
• Ethnographic Studies: Observing and interacting with a community or demographic to gather qualitative insights.
• Using Proxies: Identifying and using proxy variables that can represent the behavior or characteristics of the target demographic when direct measurement is not possible.
• A/B Testing: Testing different products, services, or message versions to see which performs better with a smaller sample size.

Fact Sheet

CivicPlus® Community Engagement Consulting

Get Your Copy

Inclusion and Accuracy are Everything

Policymakers and organizational leaders who rely on survey data to make informed decisions must appreciate and strive for the scientific accuracy that defines a successful survey. If the data is not representative, community decisions could be misguided. This issue leads to the opposite intention: residents feel that their opinions and desires were not considered, negatively impacting sentiments of trust and satisfaction.

A note about conducting scientifically sound community engagement consulting projects: If the ultimate goal is for leaders to gather quantitative and qualitative insights as they make small and large decisions throughout the year, their data has to be scientifically valid, representational, and directional. Without an in-house data scientist and research team, leaders must ensure they are partnering with research teams and analysts with experience and proven modalities that can help them through this critical process.

Data Analysis and Drawing Conclusions

With data, stakeholder conversations, and public observations, you can trust them to be representative and valid, and you can focus your energy and efforts on using what you’ve learned to inform decisions that reflect the interests of your population. There are six critical ways that well-constructed and well-executed community engagement consulting projects help build trust and satisfaction among those you serve.

1. Identifying Community Needs and Priorities

Community engagement consulting initiatives provide government and organizational leaders with comprehensive insights into what matters most to the community majority. By understanding these needs and priorities, leaders can allocate resources more effectively, ensuring that initiatives align with the public’s interests. This responsiveness builds trust as residents feel heard, see their leaders addressing their concerns, and see their community or organization continually shaping itself into an entity that reflects who they are and what they need.

2. Enhancing Transparency and Accountability

People are more likely to trust leaders who openly communicate how they make decisions and how their input is incorporated. Therefore, when you have the data to back up your decisions, it’s vital that you share it as part of your initiative communications. This transparency validates for those impacted that decisions are being made not just in a small room of privileged voices but based on impactful insights of the whole community. When leaders conduct and share results from research initiatives, it demonstrates a commitment to transparency. Discussing your methodology, results, and subsequent actions publicly helps build accountability.

3. Strengthening Community Engagement and Inclusion

Community engagements designed with scientific rigor ensure that a diverse cross-section of the population, including marginalized and underrepresented groups, is represented. By actively seeking input from all community segments, leaders demonstrate a commitment to inclusivity and equity. This inclusive approach fosters a sense of belonging and trust among residents, particularly those of historically marginalized groups who are equally valuable to a community or organization’s success.

4. Tracking Progress and Measuring Impact

Community research enables leaders to establish benchmarks and track progress over time. By regularly conducting research, governments and organizations can measure the impact of their policies and programs. This ongoing assessment helps leaders to adjust strategies as needed, showing a dedication to continuous improvement and responsiveness to community feedback.

5. Building Credibility through Evidence-Based Practices

Using scientifically validated methods to gather and analyze community feedback builds credibility. When residents and organization members see that leaders use robust, evidence-based practices to understand and address their needs, it reinforces the perception of competency and reliability. This credibility is essential for maintaining long-term trust and support.

6. Enhancing Communication and Public Relations

Engagement results can be a valuable tool for communication and public relations. Leaders can use the data, sentiments, feedback, and observed trends to craft targeted messages that resonate with the community’s concerns and aspirations. Effective communication, backed by solid data, helps to clarify intentions, justify decisions, and build a positive relationship with the public. This proactive engagement nurtures satisfaction and trust over time.

The CivicPlus® Community Engagement Consulting Service

Based on its 25-plus years of experience helping make government work better, CivicPlus, a government SaaS company, launched a Community Engagement Consulting Service as a complementary facet to its technology offerings. We are proud to be the only government software provider offering a community engagement consulting services that provides data-driven insights. Our offering is part of our comprehensive commitment to empowering communities to create positive civic experiences. It is a stand-alone service designed to help local leaders solve community challenges without the pressure of secondary service or solution purchases tied into the engagement.

If you need more scientifically valid resident engagement and survey methods to amplify your decision-making and an experienced partner to help you analyze and interpret the data, click here to learn more about our survey modalities and long-term consultative partnership model.